The key to good reporting is asking good questions. That's why reporters, not human microphone stands, are the ones who do stories that matter instead of blather that doesn't.
Here are three questions local television reporters should be asking their members of Congress.
1. Do you believe in science?
2. If yes, what specific legislative/regulatory steps should be taken to deal with climate change?
As the most recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports: "A large fraction of species faces increased extinction risk due to climate change during and beyond the 21st
century, especially as climate change interacts with other stressors (high confidence). Most plant species cannot naturally shift their geographical ranges sufficiently fast to keep up with current and high projected rates of climate change in most landscapes; most small mammals and freshwater molluscs will not be able to keep up at the rates projected under RCP4.5 and above in flat landscapes in this century (high confidence)."
3. What are the implications for life in the United States 100 years from now if Congress fails to take immediate steps to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases?
Why aren't local television reporters questioning their members of Congress about climate change?
It's one thing for the press to fail to ask questions of our politicians about little things such as going to war with Iraq. That just led to the killing thousands and spending a trillion or so dollars on a needless war instead of on education, roads, bridges and scientific research. There was no imminent threat. Saddam had no nuclear capability, and the experts were well aware of that. But climate change is hardly so insignificant as a trillion dollar needless war where the CIA decides torture's ok because the Bush Justice Department says it is.
In climate change, we have an issue affecting the future of the entire planet. Isn't it time for reporters to ask their members of Congress what needs to be done? And for those members of Congress who don't believe in science, shouldn't they be asked to explain why they choose to ignore the findings delivered by the greatest scientific minds in the world?
When journalism fails, bad things happen.
Here are three questions local television reporters should be asking their members of Congress.
1. Do you believe in science?
2. If yes, what specific legislative/regulatory steps should be taken to deal with climate change?
As the most recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change reports: "A large fraction of species faces increased extinction risk due to climate change during and beyond the 21st
century, especially as climate change interacts with other stressors (high confidence). Most plant species cannot naturally shift their geographical ranges sufficiently fast to keep up with current and high projected rates of climate change in most landscapes; most small mammals and freshwater molluscs will not be able to keep up at the rates projected under RCP4.5 and above in flat landscapes in this century (high confidence)."
3. What are the implications for life in the United States 100 years from now if Congress fails to take immediate steps to reduce the emission of greenhouse gases?
Why aren't local television reporters questioning their members of Congress about climate change?
It's one thing for the press to fail to ask questions of our politicians about little things such as going to war with Iraq. That just led to the killing thousands and spending a trillion or so dollars on a needless war instead of on education, roads, bridges and scientific research. There was no imminent threat. Saddam had no nuclear capability, and the experts were well aware of that. But climate change is hardly so insignificant as a trillion dollar needless war where the CIA decides torture's ok because the Bush Justice Department says it is.
In climate change, we have an issue affecting the future of the entire planet. Isn't it time for reporters to ask their members of Congress what needs to be done? And for those members of Congress who don't believe in science, shouldn't they be asked to explain why they choose to ignore the findings delivered by the greatest scientific minds in the world?
When journalism fails, bad things happen.
###
replica watches
ReplyDeletemlb jerseys wholesale
toms outlet
kate spade outlet
hollister pas cher
michael kors outlet online
michael kors outlet
kate spade outlet
marc jacobs
kate spade handbags
tiffany and co jewelry
hollister
hollister clothing store
burberry outlet
converse outlet
nfl jerseys
tory burch handbags
puma outlet store
iphone 6 plus cases
air jordan shoes
ray ban sunglasses uk
fred perry polo shirts
kate spade handbags
soccer jerseys for sale
salomon running shoes
lululemon
salvatore ferragamo
michael kors outlet online
snapback hats
coach outlet
coach factory outlet
fitflop sandals
fred perry shirts
cheap ray ban sunglasses
true religion jeans
oakley sunglasses
cheap mlb jerseys
mont blanc
coach factory outlet
instyler
2015328li
lc0601
ReplyDeleteoakley sunglasses
cheap nike shoes
ysl outlet
mbt shoes
chicago bears jerseys
miami heat jersey
gucci shoes
denver broncos jerseys
prada shoes
air jordan shoes
north face outlet
stuart weitzman boots
nike free 5.0
pittsburgh steelers jersey
true religion jeans
hermes birkin
green bay packers jerseys
baltimore ravens jerseys
the north face clearance
the north face outlet
dansko outlet
juicy couture outlet
minnesota vikings jerseys
indianapolis colts jerseys
new york jets jerseys
ugg boots
oakland raiders jerseys
nike free
surpa sneakers
nike running shoes
new york knicks jersey
los angeles clippers jerseys
kansas city chiefs jerseys
new york giants jerseys
hermes belt
washington redskins jerseys
san antonio spurs jerseys
air max 2014
chanel outlet
mizuno running