Friday, April 21, 2017

FOX NEWS - BIGGEST FAILURE EVER

The network's biggest star is a serial harasser.   What did FOX do years ago when associate producer Andrea Mackris wouldn't tolerate the harassment and filed suit?   FOX paid millions to keep her quiet.

Review some of the material in the court record available with a click on your favorite topic
at the Smoking Gun to get a true flavor of just how despicable O'Reilly's behavior is and ask one question:  would any responsible corporation with any ethical standards keep Bill O'Reilly employed?    No, of course not. 

But this is FOX.   



So when FOX decides to finally fire a disgusting individual who should have been shown the door after harassing his first female victim, its memo announcing the departure of a serial sexual harasser demonstrates the leadership of the corporation has zero regard for women.

FOX's Announcement

‘‘We’d like to address questions about Bill O’Reilly’s future at Fox News. After a thorough and careful review of allegations against him, the Company and Bill O’Reilly have agreed that Mr. O’Reilly will not return to the Fox News Channel.
This decision follows an extensive review done in collaboration with outside counsel.
By ratings standards, Bill O’Reilly is one of the most accomplished TV personalities in the history of cable news. In fact, his success by any measure is indisputable. Fox News has demonstrated again and again the strength of its talent bench. We have full confidence that the network will continue to be a powerhouse in cable news.
Lastly, and most importantly, we want to underscore our consistent commitment to fostering a work environment built on the values of trust and respect."

===================

FOX doesn't say one negative thing about its serial sexual harasser.   That's not really surprising from a corporation where since its founding a serial sexual harasser, Roger Ailes, ran the place like it was boy's club from the 50's.  

What could possibly be more disgusting than the FOX statement on Bill O'Reilly?   Ah, you're thinking President Trump's support of Bill O'Reilly?   No, one sexual harasser supporting another is not disgusting; it's just the state of affairs in America in 2017.   What's more disgusting than FOX's statement is Bill O'Reilly's.

O'Reilly's Statement

“Over the past 20 years at Fox News, I have been extremely proud to launch and lead one of the most successful news programs in history, which has consistently informed and entertained millions of Americans and significantly contributed to building Fox into the dominant news network in television. It is tremendously disheartening that we part ways due to completely unfounded claims. But that is the unfortunate reality many of us in the public eye must live with today. I will always look back on my time at Fox with great pride in the unprecedented success we achieved and with my deepest gratitude to all my dedicated viewers. I wish only the best for Fox News Channel.”
==================
Nobody pays millions to settle allegations that are totally unfounded.   
It does, however, make sense that the number one anchor on the network that has demonstrated since its founding absolutely no regard for the profession of journalism, that its main star attraction would put a bold face lie in his closing statement.  
FOX and Bill O'Reilly and Roger Ailes:  there's never been a trio more insulting to women or to journalism.    Send a message to FOX.   Turn off the "who do we hate today" channel. Turn off the "verifying facts prior to broadcast doesn't matter" channel.   Turn off the "it's fine to pay millions to men who harass women and who in turn them pay the victims millions to keep their mouths shut" network.  Turn off the "we have no regard for professional journalism" channel.   Turn it off.   
###



Wednesday, April 5, 2017

What Do Fox Affiliate General Managers Say about O'Reilly?

There is an astounding sentence that's hard to believe in this New York Times piece on Bill O'Reilly.  

"And inside Fox News, three women who work in the newsroom said that the continued support of Mr. O’Reilly by Fox News and its parent company, 21st Century Fox, led them to question whether the company was committed to maintaining a work environment “based on trust and respect,” as executives had promised last summer after the network’s founding chairman, Roger E. Ailes, was ousted."

Why would the women question whether 21st Century Fox is committed to a work environment based on trust and respect?   Of course it's not.   That's obvious.   If the corporation were committed to a work place based on trust and respect, Bill O'Reilly would have been fired long ago.  

What do the general managers of Fox affiliates across the country think?   Are they complaining to corporate?   Are they telling corporate to fire O'Reilly?   What do women and men in Fox newsrooms all across the country think?

Are local Fox general managers going to take a stand against sexual harassment?  If so, they'll complain to corporate.   That's what should be happening.   More than likely, the Fox affiliate general managers will be quiet.   They won't want to stand up for women, not when money is involved.   

As the parent company has demonstrated since its founding with serial sexual harasser Roger Ailes at its head, it doesn't care about sexual harassment.  It cares about money.  

Here's an easy worthwhile local story.   Call your local Fox GM.   Has the GM complained to corporate about Fox failing to fire O'Reilly?   If not, how come?   What do women in your local Fox newsroom think should be done with O'Reilly?  What do the men think?  

Sexual harassment should not be tolerated in any workplace.   It will persist as long as everyone stays quiet and does nothing.    Will O'Reilly continue on at Fox?   Most likely.  Attorney Lisa Bloom aptly and accurately describes Fox News headquarters in New York as the "Bill Cosby of corporate America."   
Attorney Lisa Bloom (L) with client Dr. Wendy Walsh
Will the parent company take substantive and strong deliberative action to change that?  Probably not.  It doesn't care about sexual harassment.  If it did, Roger Ailes never would have been hired in the first place,  and O'Reilly would have been fired long ago.   Fox IS the Bill Cosby of Corporate America.   For viewers who think sexual harassment is wrong, turn off Fox.   Turn off the station that supported the candidate for president who thinks it's ok to grab women.   It's not.  Not ever.  Sexual harassment is wrong.   It's always wrong.   It should never be tolerated, and neither should corporations who allow it year after year after year after year because the harasser has a show with high ratings.    Turn off Fox until Fox turns off Bill O'Reilly. 


###

Saturday, March 25, 2017

Network Presidents Need to Apologize

Why does the United States have the highest cost of healthcare in the world?

Why aren't ABC, NBC, CBS examining that issue in depth?   Why do the highly profitable corporate news organizations fail to do substantive reporting?   

Fox isn't included because Fox has never made any pretense of being concerned about doing substantive journalism.   Fox is there to drive a Republican agenda and to maximize profit.  

Profit, of course, is what's most important.  

Profit, of course, is what ABC, NBC and CBS have also demonstrated is most important. Our corporate news organizations don't care about the country or democracy or journalism. If they did, we would see solid in-depth reporting on healthcare, on climate change, on our continuing state of war.   We'd be seeing one special (multiple half hour, hour long shows, not 3 minute stories) if ABC, NBC, and CBS actually cared about either journalism or the country.   And thanks to the Internet, those thoughtful programs would be continually available for the public and politicians and business leaders to watch. 

Where's the substantive, in-depth reporting on what the Republicans have done for the past seven years to develop an alternative to the Affordable Care Act?   Why aren't the networks doing what professional news organizations  are supposed to do?   Why aren't they doing in-depth accountability journalism?   Why aren't our media reporters asking the network presidents to answer that question?   

The heads of ABC, CBS and NBC need to apologize to the American public.    The entire country is paying the price for the failure of the networks to do the journalism required.  The entire country is paying the price for corporate news organizations who don't care about the country, democracy or journalism, just profit.


In the movie Wall Street, Michael Douglas delivers a wonderful presentation about how "GREED IS GOOD."   There are two things to remember about this.  One:  it's a movie.   Two:  greed never has been, is not now, and never will be good.

Journalism in America is failing because of corporate greed.   Healthcare is more expensive in this country than any other because of corporate greed.    Unfortunately, the country has elected the King of Greed, Donald Trump.  

                                                                         ###




Wednesday, February 15, 2017

Make Sure You Watch the Network Special Report on Healthcare

Watch the in-depth special report each of the networks has done on Healthcare.  

Oh that's right, they haven't done one.  

In addition to calling your members of Congress, call the CEO's of NBC, ABC, and CBS and ask them to explain why the network news divisions no longer do in-depth substantive reporting on important issues confront the country.   No need to call Fox, the most profitable propaganda organization in the history of human communication.

When journalism fails, bad things happen.

###

Tuesday, February 14, 2017

Make Sure You Watch the Network Special on Climate Change

Make sure you watch the in-depth special report the networks have done on Climate Change. 

Oh that's right, the networks have never done such a report.

Operating in the public interest is no longer required to get a license to broadcast.  

In addition to calling your members of Congress, call the CEO's of NBC, ABC, and CBS and ask them to explain why the network news divisions no longer do in-depth substantive reporting on important issues confront the country.

###